CPM = Process + BI
The consolidation of business intelligence and corporate performance
management domains continue to evolve, as CPM is recognised as the
sum of BI + Process.
End-to-end solutions that can better link operational, financial
and analytical data to strategic business objectives are driving
convergence of both process and technology in the BI and performance
management arenas.
CPM is traditionally under the management of the finance organization,
used largely for financial planning and consolidation purposes,
whilst BI activities are managed by the BI competency center.
As BI and CPM get more integrated, this management distinction
is becoming blurred as BI and performance management practices support
the same business processes across three key business areas: executive,
finance and operations.
Executives – are generally only be concerned with visibility
into business performance relative to financial and strategic plans.
However, using a common BI framework, they can review the overall
health of the business using financial KPI, then dive into operational
KPI to gain more insight into performance of specific areas contributing
to the KPI. This hierarchical presentation format, using dynamic
dashboards and scorecards, ensures that operational data is not
initially presented outside of business context, but is available
as a linked drill down if required.
Both planning and financial consolidation processes require BI
to enable dynamic analysis of the cause-and-effect relationships
driving business performance.
BI in the Operations domain has largely been focused on detailed
analysis of sales, manufacturing and supply chain data to drive
operational planning and cost and revenue management.
In response to this business need convergence technology vendors
are working at close integration of CPM, BPM and BI product suites
to align to this need.
Executives, managers and analysts alike will require a common interface
to build strategic objectives and measures, develop financial plans
and report on current and future performance in an effort to minimize
cycle times and adapt to change faster than the competition.
For example, IBM's TM1 financial performance management application
has been integrated with the Cognos BI and Planning Suite of applications.
Oracle's Business Intelligence Suite Enterprise Edition Plus provides
a common user experience for all of its BI applications through
integration points with their Enterprise Performance Management
Suite.
Hence, core technologies are merging to ease transition between
BI and performance management environments. Program and project
managers involved in initiatives in any one of these three areas
must be cognisant of this holistic view of business performance,
to ensure the value of their current efforts is realized well into
the future.
This leads to a plethora of questions that executives must answer
regarding how BI and performance management competencies will be
organized and managed within their organization. The current approach
is for BI to be managed by the BI competency center. As a change
management tool, I strongly support the view that until BI has been
sufficiently deployed throughout the organization, and until traditional
financial performance cultures have been updated to more appropriate
perspectives for today’s organizations, BI should remain organized
and managed by a BICC separate from Finance. Once BI critical mass
has been achieved, alignment of the CPM and BI functions, either
back into Finance or as a conjoint BI/CPM competency center is consistent
with the alignment of the three performance methodologies. This
ensures governance, procedures and technology best practices across
the two disciplines.
Back To Top
More Articles
|